Can salmon be a rich source of calcium?
Removing the bones from cooked fish, before eating the flesh, is not only a waste of mineral nutrients. In some cases it can be difficult, and lead to a lot of waste of meat.
We know that many ancestral cultures employed slow-cooking techniques and tools, such as earth ovens (a.k.a. cooking pits; see 1). Slow-cooking fish over a long time tends to soften the bones to the point that they can be eaten with the flesh.
The photo below shows the leftovers of a whole salmon that we cooked recently. We baked it with vegetables on a tray covered with aluminum foil. We set the oven at 300 degrees Fahrenheit, and baked the salmon for about 5 hours.
The end result is that we can eat the salmon, a rich source of omega-3 fat, with the bones. No need to remove anything. Just take a chunk, as you can see in the photo, and eat it whole.
It is a good idea to marinate the salmon for a few hours prior to baking it. This will create enough moisture to ensure that the salmon does not dry up during the baking process.
If you are a carnivore, you can make a significant contribution to sustainability by eating the whole animal, or as much of the animal as possible. This applies to fish, as I discussed here before (2, 3, 4).
Add eating less to this habit, and your health will benefit greatly.
Related Posts
Low omega-6 to omega-3 ratio: Grain...
More on the Harvard study on satura...
How to make white rice nutritious
Beef meatballs, with no spaghetti
High-heat cooking will AGE you, if ...
Slow-cooked meat: Round steak, not ...
Eating fish whole: Sardines
The impressive nutrition value of w...
What is a good low carbohydrate die...
38 g of sardines or 2 fish oil soft...
Eating fish whole: Smelts
Nuts by numbers: Should you eat the...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
No comments :
Post a Comment